Wednesday, February 10, 2016

LEG 110 QUIZ 1


BUY HERE


LEG 110 Quiz 1
This quiz consist of 20 multiple choice questions. The first 10 questions cover the material in Chapter 1. The second 10 questions cover the material in Chapter 2
1.     John was tired of having his lunch stolen from his locker at his place of employment. To get even with the thief, John armed the locker with explosives that would be triggered by the movement of the lunch bag. When triggered, the explosion seriously inured Tom, who had been taking the lunches for his own consumption. Which of the following statements is true?
2.     The king most involved in the development of the English common law was
3.     An appellant is
4.     Fuentes purchased a stove and stereo from Firestone Tire and Rubber Company. Payment was to be made in monthly installments over a period of time. After two-thirds of the payments were made, Fuentes defaulted. Firestone filed an action for repossession and at the same time instructed the sheriff to seize the property pursuant to state law. The sheriff seized the property before Fuentes even knew of Firestone’s suit for repossession. Which constitutional safeguard does the state statute, which allows seizure prior to notice and hearing, violate?
5.     If Webster sues Olson for breaking Webster’s arm in a barroom fight in Lihue, Hawaii, the criminal case would be captioned
6.     Ezra is not concerned about the morality involved in Insider Trading prohibitions. Instead he adamantly believes that since these laws are valid statutes passed by Congress, people ought to obey them, end of story. To which jurisprudential school of thought would Ezra belong?
7.     When an appellate court remands a case, it
8.     In contested child custody cases, women are much more likely to be chosen the custodial parent. While the best interests of the child may favor women in all of these cases, critics might argue that social factors other than the child’s best interest might play a part in custody decisions. To which jurisprudential school of thought would these critics belong?
9.     Johnny thinks that the entire justification for Insider Trading laws is undermined by the fact that the Justice Department and the U.S. attorneys responsible for their enforcement sometimes choose to prosecute, sometimes choose not to prosecute, and sometimes choose to cut a deal in exchange for information. According to Johnny, the only certain factor is that if you are a white male with a lot of money to hire a good lawyer you will get off without serving a day . . . unless, of course, the prosecutor in his or her discretion chooses to make an example of you. To which jurisprudential school of thought would Johnny belong.
10.   What percentage of all lawsuits filed actually are decided at trial?
11.   Natural law philosophers believe all of the following except
12.   Which of the following would justify capital punishment, if it could be established in retrospect, that it had served as a deterrent to murder, and thus saved lives?
13.   Many states have developed procedures to protect the public from unscrupulous attorneys. Which of the following statements is incorrect?
14.   Metaethical scholars
15.   Traditionally, persons have not been legally obligated to intervene to aid other persons unless one of three judicially recognized duties exists. Which of the following is not one of those three duties?
16.   Martin Luther King’s Birmingham Jail letter articulated which philosophical school of thought?
17.   Which of the following would evaluate a law that permitted the imposition of capital punishment based upon the concept of a universally accepted moral duty?
18.   Ethicists study
19.   A Good Samaritan law
20.   The Florida District Court of Appeal give all of the following as reasons for its conclusion that the common law crime of misprision of a felony should not be judicially made part of Florida substantive criminal law except:


No comments:

Post a Comment